Even the opening post -- which caused most trouble -- was no more than speculation about the difficulty a lawyer would have when representing two clients with conflicting positions, where one client is considerably more influential than the other.
The rest of the posts were utterly innocuous. JC Skinner's contribution was nothing more than a series of entirely legitimate queestions.
I'm strongly tempted to take all the disputed points and re-post them as abstract, theoretical propositions. For open discussion of course.
5 comments:
JC Skinner has posted his side of the story on his blog and it makes very interesting reading.
I've been wondering about the original post and what could possibly have libellous about it.
It's gone again - seems Ward called in a second strike which has left P.ie shutdown.
I can see it, perhaps the DNS isn't directing properly as yet to the correct location.
There was nothing libellous in it.
Even the opening post -- which caused most trouble -- was no more than speculation about the difficulty a lawyer would have when representing two clients with conflicting positions, where one client is considerably more influential than the other.
The rest of the posts were utterly innocuous. JC Skinner's contribution was nothing more than a series of entirely legitimate queestions.
I'm strongly tempted to take all the disputed points and re-post them as abstract, theoretical propositions. For open discussion of course.
Post a Comment